7 min read

The Real Cost of Saying Yes: Why Subtraction Creates More Than Addition Ever Will

Every yes carries an invisible no. Learn why strategic subtraction creates more capacity than adding more strategies, hacks, and tools.
The Real Cost of Saying Yes: Why Subtraction Creates More Than Addition Ever Will
Photo by Mattia / Unsplash

When I say yes to the 5 pm meeting, I'm saying no to cooking dinner with my family. To the pre-bedtime routines. To the snuggles that matter more to me than any client deliverable ever will.

When I say yes to early morning meetings, I'm saying no to the workout that builds bone density. To the movement I need as a woman over 40 who wants to move well at 70, 80, 90 years old.

When I say yes to the meeting that falls mid-day, I'm saying no to my son's holiday concert. To chaperoning the field trip. To being present for moments I can never get back.

Every yes carries an invisible no. Sometimes the cost of accumulation shows up in things you didn't even realize you were sacrificing.

The Addition Trap

Here's the pattern most ambitious entrepreneur mothers fall into: when overwhelmed, we add solutions.

Another productivity system. Another morning routine. Another optimization framework. We add accountability partners, time-blocking strategies, project management tools. We add courses to learn efficiency. We add coaches to help us manage it all.

The instinct makes sense. Something feels broken, so we try to fix it by bringing in more resources. More structure. More support.

But addition compounds complexity. Each new system requires setup, maintenance, integration with everything else already in place. Each new commitment creates coordination costs. Each new strategy demands mental bandwidth to remember and execute.

You end up with a bloated infrastructure that requires more energy to maintain than it saves. The calendar is fuller. The to-do list is longer. The cognitive load is heavier. And somehow, you're more exhausted than when you started.

This is the addition trap: believing that doing more will create the capacity you're desperately seeking.

Multiplication by Subtraction

Dan Sullivan and Shannon Waller wrote a book called Multiplication by Subtraction about how letting go of wrong-fit team members can allow the rest of the team to grow and accomplish much more. Greg McKeown makes a similar case in Essentialism: the disciplined pursuit of less but better. Both frameworks point to the same truth: subtraction creates more than addition ever can.

The question becomes: How can I do less to receive or achieve more?

When you eliminate what depletes you, you free up three types of resources simultaneously:

Time: The obvious one. Hours previously spent on tasks you resented become available for work that energizes you or rest that restores you.

Energy: The less obvious but more valuable one. Removing resentment-inducing activities doesn't just free up the time those tasks consumed. It eliminates the emotional and physical drain of forcing yourself to do things that work against your nature. The recovery time you needed after those tasks disappears too.

Attention: The compounding one. Each commitment you eliminate reduces your cognitive load. Fewer things competing for mental bandwidth means better decisions, clearer thinking, more creative problem-solving. The quality of your work improves because you're not operating with fractured attention.

Strategic subtraction creates multiplicative effects. Each elimination creates capacity that compounds across all three resources.

The Permission Problem

If you're like most ambitious entrepreneur mothers, you already know what to eliminate. You know which clients drain you. Which meetings accomplish nothing. Which commitments you resent every time they appear on your calendar.

The tactical part is easy. What's hard is believing you're allowed to eliminate them.

I grew up with humble ancestry on both sides. Work ethic in that context, and it's very much a product of the time in the 1900s, meant outworking everyone. It was based on effort, long hours, sometimes physical toil. My maternal grandfather worked on a sugarcane plantation. That was the paradigm: your worth equals your output, and output equals hours worked.

We live in a different era now. With the advent of the internet, and especially now with artificial intelligence, we have tremendous privilege. We don't have to continue those old working paradigms.

But the beliefs run deep. I had to unlearn a lot of conditioning around my worth being equated to presenteeism. To how much I'm doing. To being visibly busy.

The cultural conditioning tells us:

  • More effort equals more value
  • Saying no is selfish
  • Elimination means failure
  • If others can handle more, you should too
  • Rest is something you earn after proving yourself
  • Availability demonstrates dedication

These beliefs aren't personal failings. They're inherited paradigms that made sense in different contexts but don't serve the work we're doing now.

The permission problem is this: it's hard to eliminate until you believe elimination is legitimate. Until you trust that your worth exists before you prove it through depletion. Until you understand that strategic subtraction is sophisticated leadership, not laziness.

The Resentment Audit

Remember the addition trap? The instinct to add more solutions when overwhelmed?

Here's the only thing worth adding: awareness.

Track where resentment lives in your week. This is different from what's hard or challenging. Resentment specifically. That corrosive emotional charge that shows up as frustration, jealousy, or that pit-in-stomach dread when certain activities appear on your calendar.

Resentment is data. It tells you where you're violating your own boundaries, working against your values, or forcing yourself into patterns that don't fit.

For one week, just notice:

  • Which tasks make you feel resentful before, during, or after doing them?
  • Which meetings drain you disproportionately?
  • Which commitments feel like obligations you "should" fulfill but genuinely don't want to?
  • Which clients or relationships leave you depleted?

Don't change anything yet. Just track the resentment. Name it. Acknowledge it as legitimate information rather than a character flaw.

Then for each source of resentment, ask: can this be delegated, automated, or eliminated entirely?

Delegate: Can someone else handle this? Often the answer is yes, but we hold onto tasks out of habit or the belief that "it's faster to do it myself." That's short-term thinking. The time invested in teaching someone else or building an automated workflow creates long-term capacity.

Automate: Can technology handle this? AI tools, workflow automation, templated systems. The setup takes time upfront but creates recurring savings.

Eliminate: Does this actually need to happen at all? Sometimes tasks persist simply because they've always been done. Question the premise. What would break if you stopped doing this entirely?

Then choose one thing. The smallest, easiest elimination that would remove resentment from your week. Do it. Notice what happens.

Each time you feel guilt or fear about eliminating something, ask: "Am I honoring my worth, or am I proving my worth?"

Worth exists before proof. Your value doesn't require justification through depletion. Strategic subtraction is sophisticated leadership.

What Gets Eliminated

The hardest thing I eliminated to protect my 3.5-day workweek was side quests. I've always had clients on the side while building my primary business. Part of that was fear of running out, fear of not having enough. Ancient fears.

The reality in this season of life: I'd rather have the time free. It's worth more to me than money. I'd rather say no to wrong-fit requests to build businesses I don't own and say yes to free time I can invest in my health, my family, and our quality of life.

That elimination required confronting very old beliefs about scarcity and security.

One elimination that surprised me by how much capacity it created: I stopped scheduling my own meetings. I empowered a virtual assistant with my scheduling preferences. Instead of me making exceptions to my own rules, I now have someone who protects my default preferences 90+ percent of the time.

When exceptions happen because of team members' travel or timing constraints, I'm happy to accommodate them. Because they're truly exceptions, not the constant erosion of boundaries that happens when you're managing your own schedule and feeling pressure to be accommodating.

What also gets eliminated:

  • Clients who don't share my values around lifestyle freedom
  • Impromptu meetings that violate my scheduling boundaries
  • Early morning calls that prevent my workout
  • Late afternoon meetings that steal family dinner
  • Mid-day commitments that conflict with being present for Pierce

I only work with people who have family time they want to protect. Then we can hold each other accountable. My clients can work as much as they want; what matters is what they expect of me.

Results matter more than hours logged. If I show up and deliver every single time, that creates air cover for the lifestyle and time allocations needed to sustain that output.

The Exponential Return

Here's what makes strategic elimination exponentially valuable: you don't just remove what depletes you. You reinvest that freed capacity into what energizes you.

When I eliminate tasks people hate doing, the average quality of their workday and workweek improves immediately. That's the first-order effect.

When I take that freed-up time and reinvest it into work they love but thought they didn't have time for, that's when exponential returns show up. Better quality work. More creative solutions. Sustainable energy. Compounding momentum.

This is why subtraction multiplies. You create space. You're redirecting resources from depletion to regeneration. From friction to flow. From forced effort to natural momentum.

What You Already Know

Every time I eliminate something now, I ask: "When I say yes to this, what am I saying no to?"

The answer reveals whether the trade-off is worth making. Sometimes it is. Many times it isn't.

The invisible cost of accumulation compounds silently until something breaks. Your health. Your relationships. Your capacity for the work that actually matters. Your presence for moments you can't get back.

You already know what to eliminate. You know which commitments steal from what you actually care about. You know which activities leave you resentful rather than energized.

The only question is: are you ready to give yourself permission?

Subtraction creates space for what you actually want your life to be about. Not someday. Now.


Marissa Brassfield is a threshold guardian helping professionals navigate major career transitions without losing themselves in the process. Since November 2022, she's personally coached 500+ professionals through threshold moments. She co-founded CTOx, a multimillion-dollar business helping tech executives build $500K+ fractional practicesโ€”while maintaining a 3.5-day workweek for 32+ months. Book a Strategic Clarity Session to explore what's possible for your transition.

Join 1,000+ professionals redesigning work on their terms.

Weekly frameworks for building lifestyle-first business models that don't require you to sacrifice your health, relationships, or peace of mind.